http://cnet.co/12IHaQl
It may look gorgeous, but is Samsung's new 4K TV worth the $40K price tag? Molly Wood unboxes the 4K TV that debuted at CES 2013 and offers her first impressions.
Comments
not worth it
i cant see 4k because it's not shot in 4k. trust me lol
4:40 . pff you dont hawe 4k baby ;) and you record it in FHD.. lost your mind?
worst tv ewer:D
How iam gona buy this on walamart?
today you can find samsung 85 in for 8000
with 1' eye resolution 85" 4k min distance for invisible pixels = 1,65 m, angle of view 58 deg. 55" 4k min distance for invisible pixels = 1,09 m, angle of view 58 deg.
58 =58 but price 85" = 20 price 55"
Can't wait to get my 200" 20k T.V.!!
I just wanna know what her pussy tastes like!!
Well, this video was posted in 2013. It's 2016 now and I just ordered the LeEco uMax85. It lists for $5k and they have a $1k rebate right now, so a bargain at $4k in just slightly over 3 years. I hope to receive it January 2017. Really looking forward to this monster and the 4k experience in my Man Cave.
that's too big for that resolution, you can see the pixels. my 5 inch phone has the same resolution
That's disgusting
$40k. lol. next year it will be $10k
pretty big, i have sony bravia 55", also very big
They could easily sell this for $100k and people would still buy it. Yet it's not worth anywhere near $40k. There isn't THAT much technology put into any TV.
yeah forty grand for a tv which can do very little my uhd tv can't, and it's too big or heavy to be useful. brilliant. why are you doing this video? you seem really, out of place.