WTC 7 - BBC The Third Tower - Conspiracy Files



In this documentary from the BBC, Barry Jennings, who is often used by conspiracy theorist as a key witness to WTC7, refutes what the conspiracy theorist believe and sets it straight for the record. More information on Jennings here: http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=230712 For a complete debunking of 9/11 myths: http://911myths.com/index.php/Main_Page http://www.debunking911.com/

Comments

  1. why didnt they speak about WTC7 in "Loose change" ?
  2. omg, i finally understand human nature, believing in 911 conspiracy is like believing in god, its the old atheist defense, prove god! show me where is the magic man in the sky! i finally get it, and this is another reason why humanity will continue to be slaves to the elite. another reason is the relatively short life span so knowledge and experience can't be learned in time.
  3. remeber the bbc covered up and still are covering up a satanic pedo ring that includes people from the royal family and major politicians
  4. 9/11 was an inside job. even stevie wonder can see that
  5. Dumb ass BBC, Silverstone admitted on film that he had bld 7 "pulled" because he said it sustained too much damage due to fire, which of course was a lie since he just took out extra insurance before 9/11.
  6. The controlled demolition claims are beyond ludicrous and only hold up any semblance of credibility when you look at the footage without any sound. A controlled demolition like this is preceeded by the deafening sound of batteries of shaped charges exploding all at once. I say PRECEEDED, the structure has to weaken first before it can break down, which typically takes a couple of seconds (as you can see from watching a couple of CD vids on YT). There is no such phenomenon with WTC7. How could there be no sound if there were huge denotations going off all around the building? To say that WTC7 was a controlled demolition is to say that the laws of physics took a break in NYC that day. This makes it much more ridiculous than simply believing that the gov would be capable of such a nefarious action and no one involved cared to whistleblow.
  7. WTC 7 can be debated by the BBC which we know it's bullshit we know it was an inside job but that's just one part you've got the Pentagon the fact that any pilot will tell you the planes couldn't have flown at that speed so much evidence it wasn't even a good conspiracy I can't believe they got away with it
  8. BBC has little credibility left. It manufactured "news" stories about Syria in 2013. These were later found to be false by British Intelligence (causing British Parliament to vote against war with Syria); and the allegations were found to be false by the CIA as well.
  9. Note how the BBC ditz (video voiceover) refers to the explosive (a very common chemical product called thermite) as, quote,  "an unconventional explosive" and later a "strange substance." Huh????  That alone, that diversion tells you this BBC video is TRASH.  And. of course, everyone knows that Gene Corley is a LYING PIECE OF SHIT.
  10. For the last 2 years a team of Phd Graduates at the University of Alaska led by top structural engineering professor Leroy Hulsey, has been tasked to prove or disprove that the official explanation of how WTC collapsed due to fire was correct.The result is to be announced in the next 2 months. This is because it is being peer reviewed by experts, to check the computer modelling & work. So far it does not look good for NIST.
    The BBC announced the collapse on air of WTC7 20 minutes before the building did actually collapse at virtually free fall speed with perfect symmetry , straight down without falling to one side. WTC7 was not hit by a plane & no steel framed building of over even 30 storeys in history has ever collapsed due to fire before.
    This is the reason over 2000 high rise architects, structural engineers , demolition experts etc. from AE911 requested this new examination to determine what made WTC7 fall. Dr Hulsey's preliminary conclusions to the study can be seen in a video on You Tube. (WTC7 Evaluation October 2016 Update : Fairbanks Engineers Host Dr Hulsey) At the end of 2016 the online version of The Daily Express had already printed the headline ' What REALLY sent it down? Shock report reveals 9/11 tower DID NOT collapse because of fire.' They seem to have decided NIST got it wrong. (www. express . co .uk/news) You guys make up your own minds. Oh & have a look at how Larry Silverstein deigned his NEW WTC7, many months before 9/11 (Google it)
  11. An spectacular example where the accused itself becomes the jury.
  12. Did anybody mention the upgrade and modernization 7 went through? Or did I miss it? You'll never convince close minded people. If you could show them Bush, Cheney, and others confessing to it all, THEY would immediately claim conspiracy, fake actors, CGI, scripted, etc.
  13. ...and where did the BBC get that building collapse information from? They got it from Reuters....and where did Reuters get their information from? Nobody asked that question. I am always amazed that the tough questions are never asked.
  14. The Oklahoma city building was bombed, actually BOMBED, yet it did NOT symmetrically collapse. it did not even tip over, not even a small localized collapse. Look at the pictures of that damaged building...three quarters of the buildings was torn away. Yet here we have building 7 with damage that can in NO WAY be compared to the damage of the Oklahoma City Bombing, symmetrically going down in the way it did. Something is very wrong. Very Very wrong.
  15. If someone is referring to the the one wing plane with half a tail section that the very wing tip cut through box columns with. Then maybe it had disapearing black boxes. ha ha ha lol.
  16. no black box has erer been destroyed by fire, not completely. but when steel beams vaporize in midair, it is pssible. but what can do that?. therein lies your lies.
  17. There were no planes till you produce the black boxes. once you do that there is proof. till then no report is legitimate, including yours,!.dumbass.


Additional Information:

Visibility: 354211

Duration: 58m 57s

Rating: 1092